GradeLens
Log in

See how your teacher will read your work, before you hand it in.

GradeLens is a student-built web tool for IB MYP students at Mahindra International School. It reads a draft against the supplied task sheet and rubric, estimates levels for the assessed criteria on a 0–8 scale, and suggests improvements. The teacher’s mark remains official.

Grade my workFind my teacher
A–D
Every MYP criterion
0–8
Levels, like your report
3
Fixes that matter most

MYP · Design

Regina Kuruthukulangara

Mahindra International School

Marked submissions
1
GradeLens track record

Not enough real marks yet (needs at least 5 from at least 3 different students).

How it works

Three steps, from draft to feedback.

No account juggling. Your drafts stay in your own account, and you stay in control of what you share.

Read the method and its limits
  1. 01

    Upload the draft

    Paste your work or drop in a PDF or DOCX, together with the task sheet and rubric your teacher handed out.

  2. 02

    Choose the teacher

    Pick who will mark it. When students have added real marks from that teacher, GradeLens checks its levels against them.

  3. 03

    Read the prediction

    Get a level for each criterion, lowered for that teacher once real marks show they mark harder, and the three changes most likely to move it.

Why GradeLens

The rubric says what. A teacher's marking says how much.

Most tools grade against a generic reading of the criteria and stop there. GradeLens reads your work against the rubric too, then checks that reading against the real marks a specific teacher has given. If they mark harder, the levels come down; real marks are never used to push them up.

Real marks only ever lower a level
  • 01

    Checked, not guessed

    Criticisms of your draft have to quote or point at something really in it, or they are dropped. With too little to go on, you get a wider range or no number at all, never a confident guess.

  • 02

    Adjusted per teacher, only downwards

    Two teachers can read the same rubric differently. When real marks show a teacher marks harder than GradeLens predicted, its levels for that teacher come down. Real marks never raise a level, and until there are some to compare with, nothing is adjusted and the report says so.

  • 03

    Fixes, not rewrites

    You get specific, criterion-linked improvements. The writing stays yours.

  • 04

    Private by design

    Your drafts are never shown to other students. Teacher patterns describe the work, never the person.

What you get

A report you can act on tonight.

A predicted level for each criterion on the 0–8 scale, shown as a range when GradeLens is less sure, what is holding each one back, and the changes with the biggest expected gain.

Example report

Made-up example

Your teacher · MYP Design

Predicted level

5–6/ 8

Criterion breakdown

  • A
    Inquiring & analysing
    5–6/8
  • B
    Developing ideas
    4–5/8
  • C
    Creating the solution
    5–6/8
  • D
    Evaluating
    6–7/8

Highest-impact fixes

  1. 01

    Connect each research finding to a design decision

    towards +1 on A

  2. 02

    Support the claims in section 3 with evidence

    towards +1 on A

  3. 03

    Explain why primary research changed the specification

    towards +1 on B

Made-up example: not a real student or teacher. Medium confidence

Ready when you are

Hand in work knowing how it is likely to be read.

A prediction and three concrete fixes, with uncertainty made clear.

Grade my workBrowse teachers